Trademarks Filed by RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC

48 trademark applications recorded in the national registry under this applicant name.

The IP India register records 48 trademark applications filed by RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC. Filings run from 29 November 2020 to 19 May 2023. The portfolio is concentrated in Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals, which accounts for 95.8% of the filings, followed by Class 3 — Cosmetics & Cleaning at 2.1%. The most common registry status across the portfolio is DRAFT (1 mark).

48Applications
3Classes covered
Nov 2020First filing
May 2023Latest filing

Classes RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC Has Filed In

NICE classes ranked by applications filed under this name. Indian trademark protection extends only to the classes actually filed in — a class absent from this table is not covered by these registrations.
NICE classShare of portfolioApplications
Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals46 (95.8%)
Class 3 — Cosmetics & Cleaning1 (2.1%)
Class 32 — Beverages (Non-Alcoholic)1 (2.1%)

Registry Status of These Filings

Status is the free-text value the registry records against each application. "Unknown" means no status had been published for that record at the last refresh.
StatusShare of portfolioApplications
Unknown47 (97.9%)
DRAFT1 (2.1%)

All Trademarks Filed by RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC

Every trademark application the register attributes to RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC, newest filing first. Each row links to that mark's full registry record.

  1. NOSHBRAL
    App. No. 5944035Class 5Filed 19 May 2023
  2. BEAUTYDAY
    App. No. 5853365Class 5Filed 18 Mar 2023
  3. BEAUTYDAY
    App. No. 5853364Class 3Filed 18 Mar 2023
  4. SANTROGERMINA
    App. No. 5841046Class 5Filed 09 Mar 2023
  5. SANTROGERMINA
    App. No. 5841045Class 5Filed 09 Mar 2023
  6. FRUTOBERRY
    App. No. 5817983Class 5Filed 21 Feb 2023
  7. PICOPATE
    App. No. 5817979Class 5Filed 21 Feb 2023
  8. HARYPHYLLIN
    App. No. 5817978Class 5Filed 21 Feb 2023
  9. HARYBION
    App. No. 5817977Class 5Filed 21 Feb 2023
  10. AMINONEURO
    App. No. 5804030Class 5Filed 11 Feb 2023
  11. PIONAZE
    App. No. 5761228Class 5Filed 12 Jan 2023
  12. COAL-O-FRESH
    App. No. 5723930Class 5Filed 16 Dec 2022
  13. NYROMFEN
    App. No. 5673237Class 5Filed 08 Nov 2022
  14. MAKSIGAMA
    App. No. 5510152Class 5Filed 29 Jun 2022
  15. RANIFLAKE
    App. No. 5491522Class 5Filed 16 Jun 2022
  16. EGOUT
    App. No. 5469604Class 5Filed 31 May 2022
  17. JFLOCEF
    App. No. 5464539Class 5Filed 27 May 2022
  18. JFLOGYL
    App. No. 5464538Class 5Filed 27 May 2022
  19. ULSORUB
    App. No. 5450158Class 5Filed 16 May 2022
  20. SAVORTIN
    App. No. 5436044Class 5Filed 05 May 2022

About this data

Source
Sourced from the official IP India trademark register and the Trade Marks Journal. Only records published by the registry are counted — never applications filed through Trademarx.
Grouped by
The applicant name recorded on each application, normalised for case, spacing and punctuation — so "RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC" and its other recorded spellings appear together on this page.
Refreshed
Hourly.
Known limitation
Marks a business holds under a group company, a subsidiary, or a founder's personal name are recorded against those names and appear on their own pages, not here.

Frequently asked questions

How many trademarks does RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC have?

48 trademark applications in the IP India register are filed under the name RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC, spanning 29 November 2020 to 19 May 2023. This counts filings recorded against that applicant name; marks held under a group company, a subsidiary, or a founder's personal name are recorded separately.

Which trademark classes does RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC file in?

Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals is the most-used class, with 46 filings — 95.8% of the portfolio. In total the portfolio covers 3 NICE classes. Indian trademark protection only extends to the classes actually filed in, so classes absent from this list are not covered by these registrations.

Can I use a brand name similar to one filed by RAVINDER KUMAR JINDAL PROPRIETOR OF OM BIOTEC?

Not safely, if it is in a class this applicant already covers. A mark that is identical or deceptively similar to an earlier filing in the same or a related class can be refused by the registry or opposed after publication. Run a clearance search across the relevant classes before adopting a name.

How current is this data?

Sourced from the official IP India trademark register and the Trade Marks Journal. Only records published by the registry are counted — never applications filed through Trademarx. Status and class shown reflect what the Registry has on file at the time of the most recent refresh.

Checking a competitor, a partner, or your own portfolio?

Free clearance search, IP India authorised agents, filing from ₹1,499 + govt. fees.

Data sourced from the official IP India trademark registry and Trade Marks Journal, refreshed continuously. Search another company →