Trademarks Filed by MUKESH KUMAR. P

24 trademark applications recorded in the national registry under this applicant name.

The IP India register records 24 trademark applications filed by MUKESH KUMAR. P. Filings run from 17 February 2011 to 19 July 2013. The portfolio is concentrated in Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals, which accounts for 95.8% of the filings, followed by Class 35 — Business & Retail Services at 4.2%. The most common registry status across the portfolio is DRAFT (24 marks).

Also recorded as:MUKESH KUMAR .PMUKESH KUMAR.P

24Applications
2Classes covered
Feb 2011First filing
Jul 2013Latest filing

Classes MUKESH KUMAR. P Has Filed In

NICE classes ranked by applications filed under this name. Indian trademark protection extends only to the classes actually filed in — a class absent from this table is not covered by these registrations.
NICE classShare of portfolioApplications
Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals23 (95.8%)
Class 35 — Business & Retail Services1 (4.2%)

Registry Status of These Filings

Status is the free-text value the registry records against each application. "Unknown" means no status had been published for that record at the last refresh.
StatusShare of portfolioApplications
DRAFT24 (100%)

All Trademarks Filed by MUKESH KUMAR. P

Every trademark application the register attributes to MUKESH KUMAR. P, newest filing first. Each row links to that mark's full registry record.

  1. URIZOCIN
    App. No. 2567323Class 5Filed 19 Jul 2013
    DRAFT
  2. BIO-GRAPES
    App. No. 2510865Class 5Filed 10 Apr 2013
    DRAFT
  3. NO-CIRCLE
    App. No. 2501598Class 5Filed 25 Mar 2013
    DRAFT
  4. MUCOFAST
    App. No. 2501596Class 5Filed 25 Mar 2013
    DRAFT
  5. VIZ-CLEAR
    App. No. 2501595Class 5Filed 25 Mar 2013
    DRAFT
  6. BECO-RED
    App. No. 2452893Class 5Filed 02 Jan 2013
    DRAFT
  7. SUPPLERICH
    App. No. 2427690Class 5Filed 15 Nov 2012
    DRAFT
  8. VITAMIN & SPA
    App. No. 2420482Class 35Filed 31 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  9. ODINOVA
    App. No. 2417945Class 5Filed 26 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  10. NIMUWALK
    App. No. 2417943Class 5Filed 26 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  11. FENCECOF
    App. No. 2413997Class 5Filed 18 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  12. HEALFULL
    App. No. 2412502Class 5Filed 16 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  13. INNER-RICH
    App. No. 2412497Class 5Filed 16 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  14. SALOME
    App. No. 2403973Class 5Filed 01 Oct 2012
    DRAFT
  15. KIDIFLAM
    App. No. 2385466Class 5Filed 24 Aug 2012
    DRAFT
  16. PAEDIFLAM
    App. No. 2385465Class 5Filed 24 Aug 2012
    DRAFT
  17. Mr.KID
    App. No. 2369784Class 5Filed 25 Jul 2012
    DRAFT
  18. PURE-SOLE
    App. No. 2291577Class 5Filed 29 Feb 2012
    DRAFT
  19. GLITASTAR
    App. No. 2274992Class 5Filed 01 Feb 2012
    DRAFT
  20. CO-FERT
    App. No. 2274990Class 5Filed 01 Feb 2012
    DRAFT

About this data

Source
Sourced from the official IP India trademark register and the Trade Marks Journal. Only records published by the registry are counted — never applications filed through Trademarx.
Grouped by
The applicant name recorded on each application, normalised for case, spacing and punctuation — so "MUKESH KUMAR. P" and its other recorded spellings appear together on this page.
Refreshed
Hourly.
Known limitation
Marks a business holds under a group company, a subsidiary, or a founder's personal name are recorded against those names and appear on their own pages, not here.

Frequently asked questions

How many trademarks does MUKESH KUMAR. P have?

24 trademark applications in the IP India register are filed under the name MUKESH KUMAR. P, spanning 17 February 2011 to 19 July 2013. This counts filings recorded against that applicant name; marks held under a group company, a subsidiary, or a founder's personal name are recorded separately.

Which trademark classes does MUKESH KUMAR. P file in?

Class 5 — Pharmaceuticals is the most-used class, with 23 filings — 95.8% of the portfolio. In total the portfolio covers 2 NICE classes. Indian trademark protection only extends to the classes actually filed in, so classes absent from this list are not covered by these registrations.

Can I use a brand name similar to one filed by MUKESH KUMAR. P?

Not safely, if it is in a class this applicant already covers. A mark that is identical or deceptively similar to an earlier filing in the same or a related class can be refused by the registry or opposed after publication. Run a clearance search across the relevant classes before adopting a name.

Why does this page show more than one spelling of the name?

Registry records carry whatever name was typed on each application, so the same business often appears under several spellings (MUKESH KUMAR. P; MUKESH KUMAR .P; MUKESH KUMAR.P). This page groups them so the full portfolio is visible in one place.

How current is this data?

Sourced from the official IP India trademark register and the Trade Marks Journal. Only records published by the registry are counted — never applications filed through Trademarx. Status and class shown reflect what the Registry has on file at the time of the most recent refresh.

Checking a competitor, a partner, or your own portfolio?

Free clearance search, IP India authorised agents, filing from ₹1,499 + govt. fees.

Data sourced from the official IP India trademark registry and Trade Marks Journal, refreshed continuously. Search another company →